Re: [sig-policy] prop-050-v002: IPv4 address transfers

[David Hughes <david.hughes@webcentral.com.au>]

Hello Shin,


On 29/01/2008, at 7:41 PM, Shin SHIRAHATA wrote:

> I think these conditions are not clear that transfer part of address
> block is allowed.
>
> For example, an entity that have /16 can transfer /17 to another  
> entity
> or entity should transfer whole of /16.


The proposal speaks of the transfer of address blocks.  It makes no  
mention of allocations.  Isn't it reasonably clear that a block being  
transfered can be a subnet of an allocation that has been made to the  
transferring entity?  There is no wording in the proposal restricting  
transfers to address blocks aligned with complete APNC allocations.


Thanks

David
...