| | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
You're here: Home |
On 26/1/08 01:35, "Jonny Martin" <jonny@jonnynet.net> wrote: > >> Is there really a problem here that we are fixing, or are we just >> arguing >> over semantics? > > The latter, I believe. > > APNIC staff - how many organisations have been denied v6 space under > the current proposal? More importantly, how many have not requested IPv6 space because they misunderstood the text to mean that they would not qualify? The proposal text states that "Some JPNIC members have pointed out that having a fixed number of planned assignments in this criteria makes it feel like an obligation that must be met." I don't know the numbers but it would be interesting to know whether there is considerable pent-up demand that would be released with a wording tweak. Input from JPNIC staff on this point would be helpful. Regards, Leo
