Re: [sig-policy] prop-050-v002: IPv4 address transfers

To: Philip Smith <pfs@cisco.com>
Subject: Re: [sig-policy] prop-050-v002: IPv4 address transfers
From: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2008 10:04:03 +0900
Cc: sig-policy@apnic.net, Toshiyuki Hosaka <hosaka@nic.ad.jp>
Delivered-to: sig-policy@clove.apnic.net
In-reply-to: <479689BA.8050303@cisco.com>
List-archive: <http://mailman.apnic.net/mailing-lists/sig-policy>
List-help: <mailto:sig-policy-request@lists.apnic.net?subject=help>
List-id: APNIC SIG on resource management policy <sig-policy.lists.apnic.net>
List-post: <mailto:sig-policy@lists.apnic.net>
List-subscribe: <http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy>, <mailto:sig-policy-request@lists.apnic.net?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy>, <mailto:sig-policy-request@lists.apnic.net?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <47959381.1000602@nic.ad.jp> <479689BA.8050303@cisco.com>
User-agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (Windows/20071031)

- incorporate NIRs, as NIRs are *not* independent resource registriesbut are part of the APNIC family
- allow LIR members of other RIRs to participate too.


and why /24 given the coming nat (or i would hope nat-pt) wave?

randy

References:
- [sig-policy] prop-050-v002: IPv4 address transfers
  - From: Toshiyuki Hosaka <hosaka@nic.ad.jp>
- Re: [sig-policy] prop-050-v002: IPv4 address transfers
  - From: Philip Smith <pfs@cisco.com>

Prev by Date: Re: [sig-policy] prop-050-v002: IPv4 address transfers
Next by Date: Re: [sig-policy] prop-053-v001: Changing minimum IPv4 allocation size to /24
Previous by thread: Re: [sig-policy] prop-050-v002: IPv4 address transfers
Next by thread: Re: [sig-policy] prop-050-v002: IPv4 address transfers
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread