Re: [sig-policy] IPv4 countdown policy proposal

[Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>]

> The point of this example was to make it self-adjusting.  As the free  
> pool gets smaller, the restrictions increase automatically.  By  
> definition, it would extend the free pool as far as it needs to go 

the problem with this is, in operational reality, when i can not
get the allocation i operationally need, the ipv4 free pool may
be there in name but it is useless because i will be forced to do
something strange such as nat or ipv6.

randy