| | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
You're here: Home |
> I'm a little worried that we might fall into a trap of focusing on > "ways to make email work" instead of realising that email no longer > fits into the registry model due to the growing need for all > transactions with the APNIC registry to be encrypted and authorised > using strong authentication methods with an immediate feedback cycle. and other than the 'immediate' for which i am not sure i see the absolute need, why is encrypted and signed email satisfactory? > I think it is worthwhile to also consider the improved workflows > that a XML/REST system provides. I see these workflows as a > prerequisite to the interactions that future registry functions > are going to need. Such future functions that centre around > resource certification. uh, i am kinda involved in the resource cert stuff. and i see no mandatory requirement to move to web only. randy
