Re: [sig-policy] Policy Proposal for End Site allocation policy for IPv6
>> As you are probably aware, I have a feeling that this idea won't be so
>> popular in JP.
>
> wow! why. the goal was simple, to separate the prefix length
> by which HD is measured from actual assignment size. that is
> all. why could someone think this bad? i am very confused.
>
I'm getting confused here too :-).
I assumed this was the same proposal as what had been proposed at the
ARIN last meeting in Montreal. Doesn't it imply to make assignments on
justifiable basis by one bit?
izumi