[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [sig-policy] Policy Proposal for End Site allocation policy for IPv6
Okay, acknowleged that the policy for "5.4.2. Assignment of multiple
/48s to a single end site" remain unchanged. Thanks Save.
izumi
Save Vocea wrote:
> Izumi,
>
> On 03/07/2006, at 1:28 PM, Izumi Okutani wrote:
>
>>
>>>> One more question I have is whether this proposal removes the
>>>> currently /48 boundary for requiring second opinion requests.
>>>
>>> oops! we are entering territory i do not know well. perhaps
>>> geoff or someone else should speak.
>> :-) yes, someone had also pointed out to me that there are no second
>> opinion requests in ARIN.
>> In AP, LIRs are required to submit a second opinion request to APNIC
>> hostmaster if they make assignments shorter than /48.
>>
>> It may sound a little operational to discuss it here, but I'm pretty
>> sure that I'd get these questions from LIRs in JP, so it would help if
>> someone could answer this point for me.
>
> The practice for second opinion request to APNIC for assignments
> shorter than /48 will remain as stated in the current policy.
>
> Save
> * sig-policy: APNIC SIG on resource management
> policy *
> _______________________________________________
> sig-policy mailing list
> sig-policy@lists.apnic.net
> http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy
>
