[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [sig-policy] Final call for comments prop-020-v001 Application of the HD ratio to IPv4

To: Save Vocea <save@apnic.net>
Subject: Re: [sig-policy] Final call for comments prop-020-v001 Application of the HD ratio to IPv4
From: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
Date: Fri, 17 Mar 2006 09:48:24 -0800
Cc: sig-policy@apnic.net
List-archive: <http://www.apnic.net/mailing-lists/sig-policy>
List-help: <mailto:sig-policy-request@lists.apnic.net?subject=help>
List-id: APNIC SIG on resource management policy <sig-policy.lists.apnic.net>
List-post: <mailto:sig-policy@lists.apnic.net>
List-subscribe: <http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy>, <mailto:sig-policy-request@lists.apnic.net?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy>, <mailto:sig-policy-request@lists.apnic.net?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <7A5D57F1-E02B-4B79-992C-F94519662D63@apnic.net>

> Status of [prop-020-v001] "Application of the HD ratio to IPv4"

please see geoff huston's analyses as to why this is a mistake
because it is quite unfair to smaller lirs.

randy

References:
- [sig-policy] Final call for comments prop-020-v001 Application of the HD ratio to IPv4
  - From: Save Vocea <save@apnic.net>

Prev by Date: [sig-policy] Final call for comments prop-032-v002 4-byte AS number policy proposal
Next by Date: Re: [sig-policy] Final call for comments prop-020-v001 Application of the HD ratio to IPv4
Previous by thread: [sig-policy] Final call for comments prop-020-v001 Application of the HD ratio to IPv4
Next by thread: Re: [sig-policy] Final call for comments prop-020-v001 Application of the HD ratio to IPv4
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread