Re: [sig-nir] RE: [sig-policy] Regarding the no consensus decisionofPROP-028-v001

[MAEMURA Akinori <maem@maem.org>]

Okay now I understand you had raised three points which would
be POTENTIAL mistakes or their causes.

Just for a prompt response.

Regards,
Akinori



In message <200512060737.jB67brB29018@mail.nic.or.kr>
   "RE: [sig-nir] RE: [sig-policy] Regarding the no consensus decisionofPROP-028-v001"
   ""Chanki Park" <ckp@nic.or.kr>" wrote:

|  
| Dear Maemura,
| 
| I didn't know what fiat was.
| I got this word from Jeff's mail, and I used it again.
| 
| At this point, ALL I am trying to do is to clarify some things
| for the future so that we don't make similar mistake again.
| 
| I hope we handle controversal issues in more professional way.
| 
| Subsiding...
| 
| Regards,
| 
| Chanki
| 
| 
| > Chanki,
| > 
| > Please give me the message-id of the mail which you mentioned,
| > then point out the part which you regard as a fiat.
| > 
| > I don't think the EC Chair did that but I will check.
| > 
| > For information, I think that Philip pointed out the message 
| > I sent on November 30, with Message-Id of 
| > 200511301759.CFI82396.NNBF@maem.org
| > 
| > 
| > Regards,
| > MAEMURA Akinori
| > 
| > 
| > 
| > | > Third, the fiat from EC chair.
| > | > If some people raised objections against SIG chair's 
| > decision, EC should
| > | > have investigated if the SIG chair's decision was 
| > reasonable and if the
| > | > objection was valid. However, the EC chair sent a fiat 
| > when the proposal was
| > | > not even EC's table. He simply cut in and stopped 
| > discussion.(I looked EC
| > | > chair's role from APNIC document, and I could not find 
| > any document that
| > | > says EC chair can cut in, stop discussion and act as a judge.)
| > | 
| > | I'm sorry, I must have missed that whole e-mail thread. Can 
| > you show me
| > | the e-mail from the chair of the APNIC EC which says "please stop
| > | discussing prop-028-v001, the NIR SIG chair made the 
| > correct decision".
| > | I saw an e-mail from the EC Chair which answered a request 
| > from the NIR
| > | SIG chair on whether or not she'd done something improper within the
| > | current policy development process framework.
| > | 
| > 
| 
|