Re: [sig-nir] RE: [sig-policy] Regarding the no consensus decisionofPROP-028-v001

[MAEMURA Akinori <maem@maem.org>]

Chanki,

Please give me the message-id of the mail which you mentioned,
then point out the part which you regard as a fiat.

I don't think the EC Chair did that but I will check.

For information, I think that Philip pointed out the message 
I sent on November 30, with Message-Id of 
200511301759.CFI82396.NNBF@maem.org


Regards,
MAEMURA Akinori



| > Third, the fiat from EC chair.
| > If some people raised objections against SIG chair's decision, EC should
| > have investigated if the SIG chair's decision was reasonable and if the
| > objection was valid. However, the EC chair sent a fiat when the proposal was
| > not even EC's table. He simply cut in and stopped discussion.(I looked EC
| > chair's role from APNIC document, and I could not find any document that
| > says EC chair can cut in, stop discussion and act as a judge.)
| 
| I'm sorry, I must have missed that whole e-mail thread. Can you show me
| the e-mail from the chair of the APNIC EC which says "please stop
| discussing prop-028-v001, the NIR SIG chair made the correct decision".
| I saw an e-mail from the EC Chair which answered a request from the NIR
| SIG chair on whether or not she'd done something improper within the
| current policy development process framework.
|