[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: [sig-nir] RE: [sig-policy] Regarding the no consensus decision ofPROP-028-v001

To: "'Chanki Park'" <ckp@nic.or.kr>, <sig-nir@lists.apnic.net>, <sig-policy@lists.apnic.net>
Subject: RE: [sig-nir] RE: [sig-policy] Regarding the no consensus decision ofPROP-028-v001
From: "Chanki Park" <ckp@nic.or.kr>
Date: Tue, 6 Dec 2005 11:05:05 +0900
Cc:
In-reply-to:
List-archive: <http://www.apnic.net/mailing-lists/sig-policy>
List-help: <mailto:sig-policy-request@lists.apnic.net?subject=help>
List-id: APNIC SIG on resource management policy <sig-policy.lists.apnic.net>
List-post: <mailto:sig-policy@lists.apnic.net>
List-subscribe: <http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy>, <mailto:sig-policy-request@lists.apnic.net?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy>, <mailto:sig-policy-request@lists.apnic.net?subject=unsubscribe>
Thread-index: AcX1k7JIgmjBWmTgToOGFj1/loTdCwAgLuBgAPzLSsAAAG2CoA==

 
> Conclusion
> Our PDP is not weak enough to alter the final result by a few people. 
                   ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
It should be:

Our PDP is weak enough to alter the final result by a few people. 

sorry...

Chanki

Prev by Date: RE: [sig-nir] RE: [sig-policy] Regarding the no consensus decision ofPROP-028-v001
Next by Date: Re: [sig-nir] RE: [sig-policy] Regarding the no consensus decision ofPROP-028-v001
Previous by thread: [sig-policy] APNIC 21 Call forproposals
Next by thread: RE: [sig-nir] RE: [sig-policy] Regarding the no consensus decisionofPROP-028-v001
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread