Mailing list archive: sig-policy (by Date)

• [sig-policy] Update on prop-032-v001: 4-byte AS number polic Geoff Huston Wed 28 Dec 2005 - 04:36 pm;
• [sig-policy] prop-032-v001: 4-byte AS number policy proposal Kenny Huang Thu 15 Dec 2005 - 12:49 pm;
• Re: [sig-nir] RE: [sig-policy] Regarding the no consensus de Jeff Williams Thu 08 Dec 2005 - 07:15 pm;
• RE: [sig-nir] RE: [sig-policy] Regarding the no consensus de Kenny Huang Wed 07 Dec 2005 - 08:43 pm;
• Re: [sig-nir] RE: [sig-policy] Regarding the no consensus de Jeff Williams Wed 07 Dec 2005 - 06:39 pm;
• Re: [sig-nir] RE: [sig-policy] Regarding the no consensus de Jeff Williams Wed 07 Dec 2005 - 06:18 pm;
• Re: [sig-nir] RE: [sig-policy] Regarding the no consensus de MAEMURA Akinori Tue 06 Dec 2005 - 07:06 pm;
• Re: [sig-nir] RE: [sig-policy] Regarding the no consensus de Izumi Okutani Tue 06 Dec 2005 - 06:33 pm;
• Re: [sig-nir] RE: [sig-policy] Regarding the no consensus de Izumi Okutani Tue 06 Dec 2005 - 06:30 pm;
• RE: [sig-nir] RE: [sig-policy] Regarding the no consensus de Chanki Park Tue 06 Dec 2005 - 05:38 pm;
• RE: [sig-nir] RE: [sig-policy] Regarding the no consensus de Chanki Park Tue 06 Dec 2005 - 05:35 pm;
• RE: [sig-nir] RE: [sig-policy] Regarding the no consensus de Chanki Park Tue 06 Dec 2005 - 05:34 pm;
• Re: [sig-nir] RE: [sig-policy] Regarding the no consensus de Philip Smith Tue 06 Dec 2005 - 04:59 pm;
• RE: [sig-nir] RE: [sig-policy] Regarding the no consensus de Tim Jones Tue 06 Dec 2005 - 04:49 pm;
• Re: [sig-nir] RE: [sig-policy] Regarding the no consensus de Anne Lord Tue 06 Dec 2005 - 04:29 pm;
• Re: [sig-nir] RE: [sig-policy] Regarding the no consensus de Stephan Millet Tue 06 Dec 2005 - 04:01 pm;
• RE: [sig-nir] RE: [sig-policy] Regarding the no consensus de Chanki Park Tue 06 Dec 2005 - 03:19 pm;
• Re: [sig-nir] RE: [sig-policy] Regarding the no consensus de MAEMURA Akinori Tue 06 Dec 2005 - 03:12 pm;
• RE: [sig-nir] RE: [sig-policy] Regarding the no consensus de Chanki Park Tue 06 Dec 2005 - 03:02 pm;
• RE: [sig-nir] RE: [sig-policy] Regarding the no consensus de Tim Jones Tue 06 Dec 2005 - 02:00 pm;
• Re: [sig-nir] RE: [sig-policy] Regarding the no consensus de Philip Smith Tue 06 Dec 2005 - 01:46 pm;
• RE: [sig-nir] RE: [sig-policy] Regarding the no consensus de Chanki Park Tue 06 Dec 2005 - 12:05 pm;
• RE: [sig-nir] RE: [sig-policy] Regarding the no consensus de Chanki Park Tue 06 Dec 2005 - 12:01 pm;
• [sig-policy] APNIC 21 Call forproposals Kenny Huang Mon 05 Dec 2005 - 07:02 pm;
• [sig-policy] APNIC 21 Call forproposals Kenny Huang Mon 05 Dec 2005 - 05:12 pm;
• Re: [sig-policy] Next step regarding PROP-028-v001 Izumi Okutani Fri 02 Dec 2005 - 01:01 pm;
• Re: [sig-policy] Regarding the no consensus decision of PROP MAEMURA Akinori Thu 01 Dec 2005 - 12:52 pm;
• RE: [sig-policy] Regarding the no consensus decision of PROP Chanki Park Thu 01 Dec 2005 - 11:16 am;