Re: [sig-nir] Re: [sig-policy] Re: Decicion :[prop-028-v001]"AbolishingI
It's David. It's a good idea, I agree to initial a working group to work
out results.
David
Izumi Okutani wrote:
>Great, how do the NIRs feel about this?
>
>Would you like to work closely on the proposal by setting up a working
>group? If yes, we can call for the volunteers publicly from the whole
>community.
>
>Izumi
>
>Philip Smith wrote:
>
>
>>Hi Izumi-san,
>>
>>Izumi Okutani said the following on 24/11/05 12:30:
>>
>>
>>
>>>As Philip has mentioned, we can still continue discussions over this
>>>proposal and work on it. We have to make a decision over this particular
>>>proposal at some point whether or not we postpone the decision, and I
>>>felt that more discussions are needed which was why I declared
>>>"no-consensus".
>>>
>>>This however doesn't mean it is the end of the proposal - we can
>>>continue discussions on this topic.
>>>
>>>
>>I'd be delighted to. I fully understand the original motivation of the
>>proposal, but the proposed solution had a financial impact on APNIC. A
>>solution which has no financial impact on APNIC would set a better
>>precedent, otherwise we could end up with a situation which Randy
>>described earlier.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>>Perhaps, we can set up a working group to work on this?
>>>
>>>
>>That's a good idea, I'd be happy to participate if you'd find that at
>>all useful.
>>
>>philip
>>--
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>sig-nir mailing list
>sig-nir at lists dot apnic dot net
>http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-nir
>
>
>