[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[sig-policy] Final call forcomments:[prop-028-v001]"AbolishingIPv6 per address fee for NIRs"

To: <sig-policy@apnic.net>
Subject: [sig-policy] Final call forcomments:[prop-028-v001]"AbolishingIPv6 per address fee for NIRs"
From: "Tim Jones" <tim@iseek.com.au>
Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2005 09:06:07 +1000
Cc:
List-archive: <http://www.apnic.net/mailing-lists/sig-policy>
List-help: <mailto:sig-policy-request@lists.apnic.net?subject=help>
List-id: APNIC SIG on resource management policy <sig-policy.lists.apnic.net>
List-post: <mailto:sig-policy@lists.apnic.net>
List-subscribe: <http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy>, <mailto:sig-policy-request@lists.apnic.net?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy>, <mailto:sig-policy-request@lists.apnic.net?subject=unsubscribe>
Thread-index: AcXDuAq7J+ZmVOV3QUazbaSjB5Nzxg==
Thread-topic: [sig-policy] Final call forcomments:[prop-028-v001]"AbolishingIPv6 per address fee for NIRs"

Good morning.

I would also like to register an objection to this proposal.

It appears as though the proposal would benefit a few at the expense of
the majority. As such, I don't believe it would be in the best interests
of APNIC as a whole for the EC to endorse this policy.


Regards,

Tim Jones

Follow-Ups:
- RE: [sig-policy] Final call forcomments:[prop-028-v001]"AbolishingIPv6per address fee for NIRs"
  - From: <ram@princess1.net>

Prev by Date: Re: [sig-policy] Final call for comments:[prop-028-v001]"AbolishingIPv6 per address fee for NIRs"
Next by Date: RE: [sig-policy] Final call forcomments:[prop-028-v001]"AbolishingIPv6per address fee for NIRs"
Previous by thread: [sig-policy] Final call for comments: [prop-028-v001] "Abolishing IPv6 per address fee for NIRs"
Next by thread: RE: [sig-policy] Final call forcomments:[prop-028-v001]"AbolishingIPv6per address fee for NIRs"
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread