[sig-policy] FWD: draft-narten-iana-rir-ipv6-considerations-00.txt

[Thomas Narten <narten@us.ibm.com>]

FYI. The global-v6 list appears to still be active, and perhaps we can
revive the list to talk about things that really cross the entire RIR
community.

Thomas

------- Forwarded Message

From: Thomas Narten <narten@cichlid.raleigh.ibm.com>
To: global-v6@lists.apnic.net
Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2005 09:40:34 +0200
Subject: draft-narten-iana-rir-ipv6-considerations-00.txt

I think/hope the global-v6 is still in operation, so this is a bit of
a test...

I've written a document that attempts to give background and describe
the bigger picture w.r.t. IPv6 address space management and the
various issues that are now being discussed (e.g., hd ratio, /48
boundary, etc.).  This document is intended to provide information and
explain the broader landscape, rather than propose specific changes,
etc.

I'd welcome discussion/feedback on it, and this list seems as good a
place as any.
 
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-narten-iana-rir-ipv6-considerations-00.txt

Likewise, there is another document that will be discussed at the
upcoming Paris IETF meeting.

http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-narten-ipv6-3177bis-48boundary-00.txt

That document will be discussed in the IPv6 WG:

      http://www.ietf.org/html.charters/ipv6-charter.html
      mailing list:  https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6

Finally, significant discussion on the general topic has already place
(and continues) in the ARIN and RIPE regions. Folk may want to
review/follow some of the discussions that have taken place there:

      http://www.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/address-policy-wg
      http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/ppml

(I believe the pointers to the ARIN/RIPE discussions have been sent to
APNIC lists, but I don't believe a lot of discussion has taken place
there - yet).

Thomas

------- End of Forwarded Message