My proposal is for `existing IPv6 address holders' which have already
applied and got IPv6 address from APNIC (most of them have got /32).
I don't say /32 is too small for every LIR, nor current policy does
not allow to allocate larger space than /32.
I want to fill the gap for new applicant and existing IPv6 address
holders. Let me show an example:
A-1. LIR-A got a /32 IPv6 address space two years ago.
A-2. One years ago, they began IPv6 service trial for 300 customers.
A-3. They have a plan to begin commercial service in six months.
A-4. (I guess) LIR-A cannot expand their address space at this point
because they do not satisfy subsequent allocation requirement.
A-5. (I guess) LIR-A can apply to expand their address space only when
number of their customers reaches the subsequent allocation criteria.
While,
B-1. LIR-B will start their commercial service, and apply IPv6 address
for the first time.
B-2. They can get enough address for their needs (e.g. /24) if they can
show their concrete plan.
B-3. LIR-B can start commercial service with the address /24.
Ah yes, for subsequent allocations. Okay! :-)
