Re: [sig-policy]Proposal prop-014-v001.txt - Lowering minimum allocation size and criteria

[Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>]

>> Also, they are not direct comments regarding this proposal, but there
>> were following comments regarding the route aggregation.
>> 
>>    - wouldn't it still be an issue for ISPs that are not able to afford
>>      the latest router? The cost of router memories are very high
>>      compared to those of PCs
> 
> Only an issue for ISPs who insist and persist in carrying the full routing 
> table across their entire network for no purpose other than "because they 
> still can".

are you saying that what we have here is the apnic secretariat
putting forth a policy proposal (i just love that apnic
bottom-up policy development) that tells isps how we should run
our routing?  and am i misreading that you are being pejorative
about our routing in some way that the exec-com does not like?

puhleeze!

randy