Re: [sig-policy]Proposal prop-014-v001.txt - Lowering minimum allocation
>> were following comments regarding the route aggregation.
>>
>> - wouldn't it still be an issue for ISPs that are not able to afford
>> the latest router? The cost of router memories are very high
>> compared to those of PCs
>
> Only an issue for ISPs who insist and persist in carrying the full routing
> table across their entire network for no purpose other than "because they
> still can".
are you saying that what we have here is the apnic secretariat
putting forth a policy proposal (i just love that apnic
bottom-up policy development) that tells isps how we should run
our routing? and am i misreading that you are being pejorative
about our routing in some way that the exec-com does not like?
puhleeze!
randy