| | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
You're here: Home |
> - we should not losen the criteria too much to break CIDR > --> may lead to networks which can meet their needs with portable > assignments requesting portable allocations. > e.g) lowering the criteria to "use /24 immediately" would make > a substantial number of enduser networks eligible to > receive allocations > --> a suggestion was made to add/replace with a multi-homing > criteria if lowering the size > > - needs a clarification in the portable assignment policy > --> losening the allocation criteria makes the distinction between > portable assignments and LIR direct allocations vague thank you, thank you, thank you. and my routers than you. i was thinking of proposing ipv4 allocations at /32, so the system would become entirely fair and there would be no barriers to entry. but satire does not come across well in a multi-cultural environment. there is a delicate balance. randy
