RE: [sig-policy]Revised APNIC Policy Process - Proposal

To: "Ron da Silva" <ron@aol.net>, <sig-policy@apnic.net>
Subject: RE: [sig-policy]Revised APNIC Policy Process - Proposal
From: "Michel Py" <michel@arneill-py.sacramento.ca.us>
Date: Mon, 8 Sep 2003 20:17:36 -0700
List-archive: <http://www.apnic.net/mailing-lists/sig-policy/>
List-help: <mailto:sig-policy-request@lists.apnic.net?subject=help>
List-id: APNIC SIG on resource management policy <sig-policy.lists.apnic.net>
List-post: <mailto:sig-policy@lists.apnic.net>
List-subscribe: <http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy>,<mailto:sig-policy-request@lists.apnic.net?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy>,<mailto:sig-policy-request@lists.apnic.net?subject=unsubscribe>
Sender: sig-policy-admin@lists.apnic.net
Thread-index: AcN2gHB2GTPKvIneSl+q5FpfEl76JAAAD03Q
Thread-topic: [sig-policy]Revised APNIC Policy Process - Proposal

> Ron da Silva wrote:
> PS: slight delay in the response was due to..uh..um...
> trans-pacific carrier pigeons needing to stop and
> refuel..  ;-)

No harm done. We understand the difficulties associated with being
RFC1149 compliant.

http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc1149.txt?number=1149

Michel.

Prev by Date: Re: [sig-policy]Revised APNIC Policy Process - Proposal
Next by Date: Re: [sig-policy]Revised APNIC Policy Process - Proposal
Previous by thread: Re: [sig-policy]Revised APNIC Policy Process - Proposal
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread