[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[sig-policy]the size of sparse allocation

To: sig-policy@apnic.net
Subject: [sig-policy]the size of sparse allocation
From: Takashi Arano <arano@inetcore.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2003 12:56:11 +0900
List-archive: <http://www.apnic.net/mailing-lists/sig-policy/>
List-help: <mailto:sig-policy-request@lists.apnic.net?subject=help>
List-id: APNIC SIG on resource management policy <sig-policy.lists.apnic.net>
List-post: <mailto:sig-policy@lists.apnic.net>
List-subscribe: <http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy>,<mailto:sig-policy-request@lists.apnic.net?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy>,<mailto:sig-policy-request@lists.apnic.net?subject=unsubscribe>
Sender: sig-policy-admin@lists.apnic.net

Hi,

the outline of IPv6 sparse allocation policy proposal got consensus
in both SIG and AMM as I previously mailed.

One issue still remains about the size of allocation (from IANA to RIRs),
/8 or /12. Let's discuss this in this mailing list.

Regards,
Takashi Arano

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [sig-policy]the size of sparse allocation
  - From: Takashi Arano <arano@inetcore.com>

Prev by Date: [sig-policy]Draft Chater of the Address Policy SIG
Next by Date: Re: [sig-policy]the size of sparse allocation
Previous by thread: [sig-policy]Draft Chater of the Address Policy SIG
Next by thread: Re: [sig-policy]the size of sparse allocation
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread