• Date Prev
• Date Next
• Thread Prev
• Thread Next
• Date Index
• Thread Index

[sig-policy]the size of sparse allocation

• To: sig-policy at apnic dot net
• Subject: [sig-policy]the size of sparse allocation
• From: Takashi Arano <arano at inetcore dot com>
• Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2003 12:56:11 +0900
• List-archive: <http://www.apnic.net/mailing-lists/sig-policy/>
• List-help: <mailto:sig-policy-request@lists.apnic.net?subject=help>
• List-id: APNIC SIG on resource management policy <sig-policy.lists.apnic.net>
• List-post: <mailto:sig-policy@lists.apnic.net>
• List-subscribe: <http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy>,<mailto:sig-policy-request@lists.apnic.net?subject=subscribe>
• List-unsubscribe: <http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy>,<mailto:sig-policy-request@lists.apnic.net?subject=unsubscribe>
• Sender: sig-policy-admin@lists.apnic.net
Hi,

the outline of IPv6 sparse allocation policy proposal got consensus
in both SIG and AMM as I previously mailed.

One issue still remains about the size of allocation (from IANA to RIRs),
/8 or /12. Let's discuss this in this mailing list.

Regards,
Takashi Arano


• Date Prev
• Date Next
• Thread Prev
• Thread Next
• Date Index
• Thread Index
• Prev by Date: [sig-policy]Draft Chater of the Address Policy SIG
• Next by Date: Re: [sig-policy]the size of sparse allocation
• Previous by thread: [sig-policy]Draft Chater of the Address Policy SIG
• Next by thread: Re: [sig-policy]the size of sparse allocation
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread