Re: [sig-policy] revised: prop-060

[Vebtel - Kusumba S <kusumba@vebtel.com>]

Dear Randy,

I am not sure if I have understood your clause as said. However, let me write here the response from what I understood:

1) If there is an unanimous consensus amongst the members within a country that a specific agency is forming an NIR, I guess even if voting process has to still go thru, the agency would get required consensus in any case.

2) If the agency can campaign for their NIR proposal within that country and reach majority, that situation also will not be a problem.

I will be happy to hear from you on the para you mentioned below.

Greetings,

Kusumba S


Randy Bush wrote:

hi kusumba,

thanks for the response.

  

I will be happy to clarify any portion of the proposal.
    

sure.  could you please clarify the following?  i could be confused, as
usual, but i could not really understand if/how you responded directly
to the following:

  

my worry is that this proposal may be vulnerable to the attack
(please excuse internet security geek terminology) that 42 people
get into a room and vote, unanimously of course, that they are an
nir.
      

randy