APNIC Home APNIC Home
Info & FAQ |  Resource services |  Training |  Meetings |  Membership |  Documents |  Whois & Search |  Internet community

You're here:  Home  Mailing Lists sig-policy 


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [sig-policy] Final call for comments: prop-033-v001 "End site assignment policy for IPv6"



Kosuke Ito wrote:

>>>>> + What would be the minimum registration requirements per endsite?
>>>>>  A suggestion JPNIC has is to allow all dynamic assignments and /64s to
>>>>>  be aggregated as LIR's infrastructure, but require all other
>>>>>  assignments per endsite, to be consistent with v4.
>>>> Would there be any particular motivation to deviate from a practice that
>>>> is consistent with Ipv4? (I can't think of any at this stage.)
>>> The reason I can think of is the overall size of the IPv6 space. If people
>>> starts registering /64s and smaller assignments to the NIR/RIR, our disk storage
>>> will fill up rather quickly and the utilization calculation will take longer.
>>> I'm not saying this can't be done.
>>>
>>> Considering that the registration requirement primary reason is to measure
>>> utilization, how about aggregating the assignment report to whatever size the HD
>>> ratio calculation is based on? And can we confirm that it is now based on /56?
>>>
>> I understand the registration requirement as for clarifying who is in
>> responsible of the address space as well as for calculating utilization.
>> Assuming this is the case, wouldn't it blur who is responsible for the
>> address space if we allow aggregation in /56?
> 
> I agree.
> There is no technical reason to say which size.
> It is the matter of balancing between how precisely RIR/NIR need
> to know the utilization of allocated address space and how easy
> each LIR report/register it with the reasonably low overhead.
> 
> Kosuke

Good points Izumi and Kosuke. Other than potential disk space and calculation
issues (not an insurmountable issue whatsoever), I have no objections to either
use the current IPv4 registration requirement or amend it to encourage/require
aggregation at the infrastructure level.

Cheers,
Sanjaya
-- 
________________________________________________________________________
Sanjaya                                     email:     sanjaya@apnic.net
Technical Services Manager, APNIC           sip:  sanjaya@voip.apnic.net
http://www.apnic.net                        phone:       +61 7 3858 3100
________________________________________________________________________