[sig-nir] RE: [sig-policy] Re: Decicion :[prop-028-v001]"AbolishingIPv6peraddressfeeforNIRs"

["Chanki Park" <ckp@nic.or.kr>]

> 
> Chanki Park said the following on 24/11/05 11:34:
> >  
> > What should be done if there were disagreement with chair's decision
> > before making decision and after the announcement.
> > What process should we take? Is there a process for this?
> > 
> > That's why I called this issue as a "procedural matter."
> 
> Ah, the issue is now apparent. Despite the fact that there was
> sufficient disquiet at the APNIC meeting about the proposal passed by
> the NIR SIG, you want it to proceed. And then you said 
> earlier that the
> NIRs don't work for their own self interest - sort of looks as though
> KRNIC/NIDA is, doesn't it? If you were interested in the good of the
> Internet community in the entire region, you'd respect other people's
> point of view and opinions, rather than trying to ram your own opinion
> down everyone else's throats.
> 
> APNIC members take note, KRNIC clearly have another agenda here.
> 

My only agenda is correcting a mistake.

And if we need, examine(or elaborate) our policy development process.

Regards,

Chanki

> > I am claiming that the chair and co-chair made WRONG decision.
> 
> The chair and co-chair had to make a decision given the feeling in the
> room. As your only interest in this proposal is to reduce the fees you
> pay to APNIC, clearly you would disagree with their decision. 
> That's life.
> 
> If you had respect for the chair and co-chair, and you had respect for
> the rest of the Internet community in the region, you'd accept their
> decision, and spend your time analysing the discussions and 
> work out how
> to make the proposal more acceptable to the entire community.
> 
> Izumi-san has proposed establishing a working group to look 
> at this. I'm
> not sure it needs to be that formal, as in my view the proposal only
> needs the minor modification to have no financial impact on 
> APNIC for it
> to be proposed and accepted at the next Member Meeting. But 
> if a working
> group is required, hopefully it can start work asap. As I said before,
> I'm happy to help, if invited to join...
> 
> philip
> --
>