Re: [sig-nir] [Fwd: [sig-ipv6] Document update - APNIC Fee Schedule]

[Izumi Okutani <izumi@nic.ad.jp>]

Okay, thanks for your imput, Billy.
Any comments from other NIRs?

Izumi

Hostmaster wrote:
> Hi Izumi,
>  
> As we discussed to make "prop-028-v001: Abolishing IPv6 per address fee for NIRs",
> we, NIRs, aleady know pros and cons of this proposal.
> 
> KRNIC of NIDA would like to keep it active for more comments and discussion 
> with APNIC members at the 20th policy SIG.
>  
> However, KRNIC of NIDA will follow the majority, so please let us know
> others' opinion.
> 
> Thanks for your efforts
> Billy on behalf of KRNIC of NIDA
> 
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Izumi Okutani" <izumi@nic.ad.jp>
> To: <sig-nir@lists.apnic.net>
> Sent: Monday, July 11, 2005 4:08 PM
> Subject: [sig-nir] [Fwd: [sig-ipv6] Document update - APNIC Fee Schedule]
> 
> 
> 
>>Dear All,
>>
>>
>>APNIC has implemented the change in its fee schedule with 90% discount
>>on the IPv6 per address fee(see the attached annoucement for details).
>>
>>This is related to "prop-028-v001" proposed at this SIG, and it would be
>>upto the proposer(NIRs) to drop the proposal or keep it active for
>>continued discussions.
>>
>>"prop-028-v001:Abolishing IPv6 per address fee for NIRs"
>> http://www.apnic.net/docs/policy/discussions/prop-028-v001.txt
>>
>>What do you wish to do about this proposal? >NIRs
>>
>>
>>Regards,
>>Izumi
>>
> 
> 
> 
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> 
> 
>>_______________________________________________
>>sig-nir mailing list
>>sig-nir@lists.apnic.net
>>http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-nir
> 
>>