Re: [sig-nir] Forming WG to discuss about NIR Fee

[MAEMURA Akinori <maem@maem.org>]

| Maemura San,
| 
| > so the working group would be 
| 
| What would you like the name of the working group to be? One suggestion
| could be "wg-nir-fee@lists.apnic.net"? 
| 
fine!


| Also please advise of the names of those who should be subscribed to 
| the working group.
| 
Colleagues please present your name if you volunteer to this
WG.


| The Secretariat will set this up and let you know as soon as it is 
| done.
| 
Thanks always.  Let's move it forward toward Kyoto.

Regards,
Akinori

| Best wishes,
| Anne
| --
| 
| >  1)	to be closed within NIRs and APNIC Secretariat
| >  2)	to share the fee and address size figure among us
| >  3)	to try some models to see if one is reasonable
| >  4)	to open the result as soon as we try till 3)
| >  5)	Should conclude after open discussion
| > 
| > 
| > I thinks APNIC Secretariat will work for keeping the closed
| > discussion reasonable for whole membership.
| > 
| > 
| > EC and non-NIR colleagues please advise me if you have
| > any suggestion to keep this agenda confortable to whole
| > membership.  
| > 
| > 
| > Regards,
| > MAEMURA Akinori, on behalf of one of NIR
| > 
| > 
| > 
| > 
| > 
| > 
| > 
| > 
| > 
| > In message <01b401c4ab70$551d0ab0$8fd0ffcb@LocalHost>
| >    "Re: [sig-nir] Forming WG to discuss about NIR Fee"
| >    ""ywju" <ywju@nic.or.kr>" wrote:
| > 
| > | Dear all, 
| > | 
| > | To begin with, Thank Maemura for your good suggestion. 
| > | About Maemura's suggestion, my opinion is as belows. 
| > | 
| > | 
| > | > NIR Colleagues,
| > | > 
| > | > Regarding the NIR Fee, JPNIC IP Department has just had a 
| > | > brief discussion.  
| > | > 
| > | > One of the way to look for a reasonable fee schedule is 
| > | > raising some example schedules and/or models and then 
| > | > applying current facts to verify if it is reasonable.
| > | 
| > | Yes, sure. 
| > |  
| > | > We notice that for verification we need all figures from
| > | > per address fee amount, number of members and total address
| > | > space of all NIRs'. but they are of course not disclosed.
| > | 
| > | I agree with this.And as I think, we need the information on budget status
| > | of each NIR. 
| > | That is to say, we should consider NIR's operation cost of each NIR 
| > | in order to check how much APNIC fee affect NIR's financial status under
| > | their own economic situation. 
| > | 
| > | > I think in this case we should form a *closed* working group
| > | > which contains all NIRs and APNIC Secretariat to share such
| > | > closed data.  
| > | 
| > | In this context, I also have the same idea with JPNIC. We should form 
| > | WG which will be participated from all NIRs & APNIC. 
| > | 
| > | I also expect another good ideas from other NIRs. 
| > | 
| > | Sincerely yours, 
| > | 
| > | Yong Wan Ju
| > | 
| > | _______________________________________________
| > | sig-nir mailing list
| > | sig-nir@lists.apnic.net
| > | http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-nir
| > 
| > _______________________________________________
| > sig-nir mailing list
| > sig-nir@lists.apnic.net
| > http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-nir
| > 
|