[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [SIG-IX] Fwd: IPv6 Peering
1. Would you prefer:
a. to use dual-stack on the same port/collision domain
I'd prefer dual stack - just like Eq SV/LA etc - having different ports
means extra xconnect charges from Equinix :-)
b. to have an entirely separate collision domain for v6 peering
Not fussed - same is fine to me, separate has other measurement advantages.
2. Would you prefer:
a. bi-lateral peering
b. multi-lateral peering
One OR the other, but not mixed.
And to see if we could get some interest in the mailing list. :o)
Well, I found out about it :-)
MMC
Raphael Ho
Equinix Asia Pacific
Director - Network Engineering & Operations
Direct +852 29707721
Fax +852 29705882
_______________________________________________
sig-ix mailing list
sig-ix@lists.apnic.net
http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-ix
--
Mark Newton Email:
newton@internode.com.au (W)
Network Engineer Email:
newton@atdot.dotat.org (H)
Internode Systems Pty Ltd Desk: +61-8-82282999
"Network Man" - Anagram of "Mark Newton" Mobile: +61-416-202-223
--
Matthew Moyle-Croft - Internode/Agile - Networks
Level 5, 150 Grenfell Street, Adelaide, SA 5000 Australia
Email: mmc@internode.com.au Web: http://www.on.net
Direct: +61-8-8228-2909 Mobile: +61-419-900-366
Reception: +61-8-8228-2999 Fax: +61-8-8235-6909
"The difficulty lies, not in the new ideas,
but in escaping from the old ones" - John Maynard Keynes
