[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [SIG-IX] IPv6 Peering

To: sig-ix@lists.apnic.net
Subject: Re: [SIG-IX] IPv6 Peering
From: Gaurab Raj Upadhaya <gaurab@lahai.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2008 04:04:51 +0000
Delivered-to: sig-ix@clove.apnic.net
In-reply-to: <C404468A.33F9%raphael.ho@ap.equinix.com>
List-archive: <http://mailman.apnic.net/mailing-lists/sig-ix>
List-help: <mailto:sig-ix-request@lists.apnic.net?subject=help>
List-id: "APNIC Internet Exchange Point Special Interest group." <sig-ix.lists.apnic.net>
List-post: <mailto:sig-ix@lists.apnic.net>
List-subscribe: <http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-ix>, <mailto:sig-ix-request@lists.apnic.net?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-ix>, <mailto:sig-ix-request@lists.apnic.net?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <C404468A.33F9%raphael.ho@ap.equinix.com>
User-agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.12 (Macintosh/20080213)

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Raphael Ho wrote:
|
| Anybody has any violent reaction on the vlan idea?


There is more work added for the sp in using .1q vlans. In most v6
deployment i have seen, it's dual stack all over the core, and adding
the additional vlan bit just to peer over v6 may not excite many people.
(wont' excite me for sure).  Nevermind, whatever vlan numbering you use
on the IXP switch may end up conflicting with internal vlans for the
provider.

thanks
~ -gaurab
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (Darwin)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFH3z9jSo7fU26F3X0RAhqDAKC/mOrcMYVaR15JxBrowfQugFPAMACdGj5r
0in3Jk8/ioGDRdOlIc1dsl4=
=SG/c
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

References:
- Re: [SIG-IX] IPv6 Peering
  - From: Raphael Ho <raphael.ho@ap.equinix.com>

Prev by Date: Re: [SIG-IX] IPv6 Peering
Next by Date: Re: [SIG-IX] IPv6 Peering
Previous by thread: Re: [SIG-IX] IPv6 Peering
Next by thread: Re: [SIG-IX] IPv6 Peering
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread