[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [sig-ipv6]Summary
Hello Anne,
Thank you for your comments.
> I dont understand the reference to the HD ratio. This is already a part of
> the current IPv6 allocation and assignment policy as the way to measure
> utilisation. There was an informational presentation at APNIC16 to replace
> the current 80% utilisation figure in IPv4 with the HD ratio.This is
> currently being discussed in other regions, but was only informational in
> the AP region.
>
> Is there possibly some confusion with the IPv4 presentation or was there
> something else being referred to here? Either way the next status report
> from APNIC can certainly include a closer look at the HD ratio in IPv6 if
> that would be helpful.
On slide 4 in Tim's material, we can see only /32 and /35. But if my
understanding is correct, some ISPs already obtains shorter (larger)
prefix than /32.
I can find the number /27 in the slide of IPv6 routing table only. Is
this one large prefix assigned to one big ISP? Such things are not
clear to me.
I would like to know how many /32, /31, /30, /29, etc are already
assigned from APNIC report.
What I referred to is Paul's "IPv6 allocations to IPv4 networks" in
Policy SIG. Am I confused? It would be appreciated if you kindly
clarify things relating to the HD ratio.
--Kazu
