APNIC Home APNIC Home
Info & FAQ |  Resource services |  Training |  Meetings |  Membership |  Documents |  Whois & Search |  Internet community

You're here:  Home  Mailing Lists sig-ipv6 


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[sig-ipv6] BOUNCE sig-ipv6@lists.apnic.net: Non-member submission from [Robert Elz <kre@munnari.OZ.AU>]



>From owner-sig-ipv6  Sat Jul  8 04:01:04 2000
Received: from munnari.OZ.AU (munnari.OZ.AU [128.250.1.21])
	by whois.apnic.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id EAA100885
	for <sig-ipv6@apnic.net>; Sat, 8 Jul 2000 04:01:02 +1000 (EST)
Received: from mundamutti.cs.mu.OZ.AU ([128.250.1.5])
	by munnari.OZ.AU with SMTP (5.83--+1.3.1+0.59) id SA30400;
	Sat, 8 Jul 2000 04:00:43 +1000 (from kre@munnari.OZ.AU)
From: Robert Elz <kre@munnari.OZ.AU>
To: Ignatios Souvatzis <ignatios@cs.uni-bonn.de>
Cc: ipng@sunroof.eng.sun.com, ngtrans@sunroof.eng.sun.com, sig-ipv6@apnic.net,
        mir@ripe.net, joao@ripe.net
Subject: Re: (ngtrans) Fw: [apnic-announce] IPv6 Policy Document Revision 
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Fri, 07 Jul 2000 18:57:50 +0200."
             <20000707185750.C25625@theory.cs.uni-bonn.de> 
Date: Sat, 08 Jul 2000 04:00:43 +1000
Message-Id: <19698.962992843@mundamutti.cs.mu.OZ.AU>

    Date:        Fri, 7 Jul 2000 18:57:50 +0200
    From:        Ignatios Souvatzis <ignatios@cs.uni-bonn.de>
    Message-ID:  <20000707185750.C25625@theory.cs.uni-bonn.de>

This is a non-issue, because we're not doing this, but ...

  | assuming everybody could afford (at least) on phone, IP(v6) over the NMBA
  | network called "the world-wide phone system" already would need more then
  | 2^32 addresses, right?

That's going to depend upon whether there is internal structure in that
numbering, aside from what is in the phone numbers already.  2^32 is
probably too small for that particular subnet, but ...

  | /80 would be a problem even for all phones in Germany.

Germany really has more than 2^48 phones?  Or even more than a 2^48
phone number space?   That's a 15 (decimal) digit phone number space.

In any case, the 2^64 space allocated for subnets is easily going to
be big enough to map the POTS number space, should anyone actually
want to do that.

kre

*              sig-ipv6:  APNIC SIG on IPv6 technology and policy issues           *
* To unsubscribe: send "unsubscribe" to sig-ipv6-request@apnic.net *