APNIC Home APNIC Home
Info & FAQ |  Resource services |  Training |  Meetings |  Membership |  Documents |  Whois & Search |  Internet community

You're here:  Home  Mailing Lists sig-ipv6 


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[sig-ipv6] BOUNCE sig-ipv6@lists.apnic.net: Non-member submission from [Brian E Carpenter <brian@hursley.ibm.com>]



>From owner-sig-ipv6  Sat Jul  8 02:42:37 2000
Received: from mail-gw.hursley.ibm.com (mail-gw.hursley.ibm.com [194.196.110.15])
	by whois.apnic.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id CAA99327
	for <sig-ipv6@apnic.net>; Sat, 8 Jul 2000 02:42:34 +1000 (EST)
Received: from sp3at21.hursley.ibm.com (sp3at21.hursley.ibm.com [9.20.45.21]) by mail-gw.hursley.ibm.com (AIX4.3/UCB 8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id RAA21626; Fri, 7 Jul 2000 17:42:15 +0100
Received: from hursley.ibm.com (gsine01.us.sine.ibm.com [9.14.6.41]) by sp3at21.hursley.ibm.com (AIX4.2/UCB 8.7/8.7.3) with ESMTP id RAA24104; Fri, 7 Jul 2000 17:42:25 +0100 (BST)
Message-ID: <39660803.C8EECA45@hursley.ibm.com>
Date: Fri, 07 Jul 2000 11:40:35 -0500
From: Brian E Carpenter <brian@hursley.ibm.com>
Organization: IBM
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.61 [en] (Win98; I)
X-Accept-Language: en,fr
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Tim Chown <tjc@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
CC: Steve Deering <deering@cisco.com>,
        Francis Dupont <Francis.Dupont@enst-bretagne.fr>, stephenb@uk.uu.net,
        ipng@sunroof.eng.sun.com, ngtrans@sunroof.eng.sun.com,
        arano@byd.ocn.ad.jp, sig-ipv6@apnic.net, mir@ripe.net, joao@ripe.net
Subject: Re: (ngtrans) Fw: [apnic-announce] IPv6 Policy Document Revision
References: <Pine.SOL.4.20.0007071703400.16436-100000@penelope.ecs.soton.ac.uk>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Tim Chown wrote:
...
> I would be interested to know what the addressing requirements of a mobile
> provider would be, in terms of scale and subnetting.  What would the
> "home prefix" of 1,000,000 Vodaphone customers be, for example?  I've
> not yet seen a draft IPv6 allocation policy for a mobile provider.

Good question but it's certainly not a problem unless needlessly
restrictive allocation policies make it so. 1M is a small number in IPv6 land.

  Brian

*              sig-ipv6:  APNIC SIG on IPv6 technology and policy issues           *
* To unsubscribe: send "unsubscribe" to sig-ipv6-request@apnic.net *