[sig-ipv6] BOUNCE sig-ipv6@lists.apnic.net: Non-member submission from [Randy Bush <rbush@bainbridge.verio.net>]

[owner-sig-ipv6@lists.apnic.net]

>From owner-sig-ipv6  Fri Jul  7 22:56:48 2000
Received: from roam.psg.com (cnri-2-112.cnri.reston.va.us [132.151.2.112])
	by whois.apnic.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id WAA95045
	for <sig-ipv6@apnic.net>; Fri, 7 Jul 2000 22:56:46 +1000 (EST)
Received: from randy by roam.psg.com with local (Exim 3.12 #1)
	id 13AXgH-0001FT-00; Fri, 07 Jul 2000 08:56:33 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Randy Bush <rbush@bainbridge.verio.net>
To: Francis Dupont <Francis.Dupont@enst-bretagne.fr>
Cc: Brian E Carpenter <brian@hursley.ibm.com>, stephenb@uk.uu.net,
        ipng@sunroof.eng.sun.com, ngtrans@sunroof.eng.sun.com,
        arano@byd.ocn.ad.jp, sig-ipv6@apnic.net, mir@ripe.net, joao@ripe.net
Subject: Re: (ngtrans) Fw: [apnic-announce] IPv6 Policy Document Revision 
References: <3964DE58.7DB92581@hursley.ibm.com>
	<200007070722.JAA52803@givry.rennes.enst-bretagne.fr>
Message-Id: <E13AXgH-0001FT-00@roam.psg.com>
Sender: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
Date: Fri, 07 Jul 2000 08:56:33 -0400

> => many ISPs want to allocate /64 (or worse) to their customers... and
> shout a /48 per customer is far too large. I believe this is a consequence
> of the slow^N start, ie. the /35 rule (RIRs trim address space of ISPs,
> ISPs take back the burden to their customers).

someone who gets it!  the /35 game sucks.

randy

*              sig-ipv6:  APNIC SIG on IPv6 technology and policy issues           *
* To unsubscribe: send "unsubscribe" to sig-ipv6-request@apnic.net *