[sig-ipv6] BOUNCE sig-ipv6@lists.apnic.net: Non-member submission from [Brad Huntting <huntting@hunkular.glarp.com>]

[owner-sig-ipv6@lists.apnic.net]

>From owner-sig-ipv6  Sat Jul  8 01:57:08 2000
Received: from hunkular.glarp.com (hunkular.glarp.com [199.117.25.251])
	by whois.apnic.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id BAA98501
	for <sig-ipv6@apnic.net>; Sat, 8 Jul 2000 01:57:06 +1000 (EST)
Received: from hunkular.glarp.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by hunkular.glarp.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id JAA01092;
	Fri, 7 Jul 2000 09:56:23 -0600 (MDT)
	(envelope-from huntting@hunkular.glarp.com)
Message-Id: <200007071556.JAA01092@hunkular.glarp.com>
To: Steve Deering <deering@cisco.com>
cc: Tim Chown <tjc@ecs.soton.ac.uk>,
        Francis Dupont <Francis.Dupont@enst-bretagne.fr>,
        Brian E Carpenter <brian@hursley.ibm.com>, stephenb@uk.uu.net,
        ipng@sunroof.eng.sun.com, ngtrans@sunroof.eng.sun.com,
        arano@byd.ocn.ad.jp, sig-ipv6@apnic.net, mir@ripe.net, joao@ripe.net
Subject: Re: (ngtrans) Fw: [apnic-announce] IPv6 Policy Document Revision 
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Fri, 07 Jul 2000 07:51:19 PDT."
             <v04220802b58b9b380355@[10.19.130.188]> 
Date: Fri, 07 Jul 2000 09:56:23 -0600
From: Brad Huntting <huntting@hunkular.glarp.com>


> It's only "bizarre" if address space is a scarce resource; the purpose and
> design of IPv6 was to make it a non-scarce resource.

IMHO, the problem lies with using /64 for the default subnet size;
/80 would probably be more than enough for any conceivable "layer
2" protocol.


brad

*              sig-ipv6:  APNIC SIG on IPv6 technology and policy issues           *
* To unsubscribe: send "unsubscribe" to sig-ipv6-request@apnic.net *