[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Abstract] The Impact of Democratic Deficits on Electronic Media in Rural Development
The Impact of Democratic Deficits on Electronic Media in Rural
Development by Robin Van Koert
First Monday, volume 7, number 4 (April 2002)
Abstract
In the second half of the 1990s the enthusiasm for the potential of
ICTs, or electronic media, to facilitate, or even to create, economic
development in developing countries was buoyant. In a sense, ICTs
were expected to create information flows which would no longer be
limited by geographical boundaries. As a result, experts on rural
development in developing countries claimed that, finally, people in
rural areas in developing countries would have access to huge amounts
of information. Those same experts also typically envisaged the
advent of free flows of information, which would elude conventional
restrictions on information flows imposed by nation-states concerned
with the impact of such free information flows on government power.
Governments, so it seemed, would no longer be capable of denying
their citizens access to the large pools of information available
through the Internet.
Amidst the enthusiasm for the "liberating potential" of ICTs, I
decided to conduct in-depth research on the validity of the widely
accepted premise that the influence of the political situation in a
nation-state on the free flow of information was rapidly diminishing.
The basic assumption of my research was that the value of the
"democratic deficit" of a nation- state would be more decisive for
the actual role of ICT in rural development than the intrinsic
interactivity of ICTs. In order to test the basic assumption, I
conducted field research in Indonesia (1998), Peru (1999) and Vietnam
(1998). The qualitative research data suggested that the level of
interactive use of ICT in rural development efforts appears, to a
large extent, to be determined by the state of democracy in a nation-
state. Unsurprisingly, the research data indicated that the value of
the "democratic deficit" increased from Peru, through Indonesia, to
Vietnam. At the same time, the level of interactivity of ICTs in
rural development decreased in the opposite direction.
In this paper I will present the main results and conclusions of the
research, which indicate that, despite the unique and acknowledged de-
centralizing features of the Internet, governments continue to be
capable of controlling information flows, either through political or
economic restrictions on the use of ICT, or electronic media.
Although this may not be a revolutionary finding, it is a conclusion
which serves as a reminder that the way technology
eventually contributes to rural development by and large is still
determined by the nature of the socio-political and economic context
of a given nation-state.
read complete paper at http://firstmonday.org/issues/issue7_4/koert/