![]() |
![]() |
|
You're here: Home |
Hi Randy,I recall receiving your comments -- if the NRO and others decide to have the CP become a SIDR I-D and if they haven't addressed them during their time as document owners, then we will try to do so when we convert it back to an I-D. (Though I doubt we'll be able to reduce the 6.5 page table of contents :-).)
Thank you, Karen
hi karen,As mentioned in July (see attached email), if the CP is to resume its status as a SIDR I-D, we (BBN) need to incorporate revisions provided by the NRO, and submit it for the November IETF. To meet the IETF I-D^ and all others, e.g. operatorssubmission deadline of November 3rd, we need the text with your changes by October 27th.and i did send in comment on some pervasive issues. randy