Re: Proposed Up/Down protocol description

To: Resource Cert List <rescert@apnic.net>
Subject: Re: Proposed Up/Down protocol description
From: Rob Austein <sra@isc.org>
Date: Mon, 21 May 2007 19:57:02 -0400
In-reply-to: <7.0.0.16.2.20070522094050.01441320@apnic.net>
References: <7.0.0.16.2.20070516122258.07116810@apnic.net> <20070517225346.BA1DA22826@thrintun.hactrn.net> <7.0.0.16.2.20070518165228.014415b8@apnic.net> <20070518175247.9CCFF22826@thrintun.hactrn.net> <AC9A3E81-D0BB-4B18-8C40-015875E46084@apnic.net> <4651AABA.9020804@psg.com> <7.0.0.16.2.20070522094050.01441320@apnic.net>
User-agent: Wanderlust/2.14.0 (Africa) Emacs/21.3 Mule/5.0 (SAKAKI)

At Tue, 22 May 2007 09:42:29 +1000, Geoff Huston wrote:
>
> Right now the sender and receiver have to be at the same version, namely 1.
> 
> We could simply leave it at that for the moment and move on.

Works for me.

References:
- Proposed Up/Down protocol description
  - From: Geoff Huston <gih@apnic.net>
- Re: Proposed Up/Down protocol description
  - From: Rob Austein <sra@hactrn.net>
- Re: Proposed Up/Down protocol description
  - From: Geoff Huston <gih@apnic.net>
- Re: Proposed Up/Down protocol description
  - From: Rob Austein <sra@hactrn.net>
- Re: Proposed Up/Down protocol description
  - From: Byron Ellacott <bje@apnic.net>
- Re: Proposed Up/Down protocol description
  - From: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
- Re: Proposed Up/Down protocol description
  - From: Geoff Huston <gih@apnic.net>

Prev by Date: Re: Proposed Up/Down protocol description
Next by Date: Re: Proposed Up/Down protocol description
Previous by thread: Re: Proposed Up/Down protocol description
Next by thread: Re: Proposed Up/Down protocol description
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread