APNIC Home

APNIC Home

Info & FAQ | Resource services | Training | Meetings | Membership | Documents | Whois & Search | Internet community

You're here: Home Mailing Lists rescert

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Proposal: "child state" value

To: Robert Kisteleki <robert@ripe.net>
Subject: Re: Proposal: "child state" value
From: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2007 12:34:43 +0100
Cc: Resource Cert List <rescert@apnic.net>
In-reply-to: <4625E471.80400@ripe.net>
References: <4625E471.80400@ripe.net>
User-agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.10 (Windows/20070221)

> Consequently, the RE can keep track of the child state, and accept/deny
> the certificate requests from them.

and, operationally, why does one want to do this?  this feature is
necessary because?

randy

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Proposal: "child state" value
  - From: Robert Kisteleki <robert@ripe.net>

References:
- Proposal: "child state" value
  - From: Robert Kisteleki <robert@ripe.net>

Prev by Date: Proposal: valid-until time for an allocation
Next by Date: Re: Proposal: "child state" value
Previous by thread: Proposal: "child state" value
Next by thread: Re: Proposal: "child state" value
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread