![]() |
![]() |
|
You're here: Home |
At Tue, 17 Apr 2007 22:10:00 -0400, Tim Christensen wrote: > > So you can say that <self>'s signing contexts are those > granted through relationship with <parent>, abstracted > by <ca>; and in the degenerate case of the RIR, I'd > suggest a foster parent and hang CA(s) off the bottom > of it, eliminating the <self>1:n<ca> link. Does that seem > to work? Sounds right to me. > I guess some attributes might need tweeking... Yep. Fortunately, I'm still thinking about all this in Lisp, so I can just set the parent URI to t and have done. :)