RE: [pacnog] Using RFC1918 addresses for peering points

["Alo Anesi" <Alo.Anesi@bluesky.as>]

No, they literally just gave us a 10.2.1.0/30 to use for the connection.
I've already replied that we would use a /30 from our APNIC portable
address space.

However, this doesn't reassure me in regards to this upstream provider:
=)

- Alo 

-----Original Message-----
From: Bill Woodcock [mailto:woody@pch.net] 
Sent: Thursday, June 29, 2006 2:19 PM
To: Alo Anesi
Cc: Li'a Tufele Jr; pacnog@pacnog.org
Subject: Re: [pacnog] Using RFC1918 addresses for peering points

    > I've got an upstream who wants to use a 10.x.x.x/30 for our
peering
    > point. Is this unusual? I've always used public IPs for this.

Yes, that's unusual.  Public IPs will allow for easier debugging, proper
in-addr DNS resolution, et cetera.

Have they suggested any reason for using private space?

                                -Bill