Re: [pacnog] Using RFC1918 addresses for peering points

To: Alo Anesi <Alo.Anesi@bluesky.as>
Subject: Re: [pacnog] Using RFC1918 addresses for peering points
From: Bill Woodcock <woody@pch.net>
Date: Thu, 29 Jun 2006 18:19:03 -0700 (PDT)
Cc: "Tufele Jr, Li'a" <LTufele@bluesky.as>, pacnog@pacnog.org
In-reply-to: <CF9556B520BA3346A7D8D22B0AF3A371DCC415@astmx.ad.bluesky.as>
List-archive: <http://www.apnic.net/mailing-lists/pacnog>
List-help: <mailto:pacnog-request@pacnog.org?subject=help>
List-id: Pacific Network Operators Group <pacnog.pacnog.org>
List-post: <mailto:pacnog@pacnog.org>
List-subscribe: <http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/pacnog>, <mailto:pacnog-request@pacnog.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/pacnog>, <mailto:pacnog-request@pacnog.org?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <CF9556B520BA3346A7D8D22B0AF3A371DCC415@astmx.ad.bluesky.as>

    > I've got an upstream who wants to use a 10.x.x.x/30 for our peering
    > point. Is this unusual? I've always used public IPs for this.

Yes, that's unusual.  Public IPs will allow for easier debugging, proper 
in-addr DNS resolution, et cetera.

Have they suggested any reason for using private space?

                                -Bill

References:
- [pacnog] Using RFC1918 addresses for peering points
  - From: "Alo Anesi" <Alo.Anesi@bluesky.as>

Prev by Date: [pacnog] Using RFC1918 addresses for peering points
Next by Date: RE: [pacnog] Using RFC1918 addresses for peering points
Previous by thread: [pacnog] Using RFC1918 addresses for peering points
Next by thread: Re: [pacnog] Using RFC1918 addresses for peering points
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread