Re: [pacnog] Southern Cross Fault?

To: Dan McGarry <it.psl@fsp.org.vu>
Subject: Re: [pacnog] Southern Cross Fault?
From: Joe Abley <jabley@ca.afilias.info>
Date: Wed, 31 May 2006 19:26:05 -0400
Cc: pacnog@pacnog.org
In-reply-to: <447E239B.3000902@fsp.org.vu>
List-archive: <http://www.apnic.net/mailing-lists/pacnog>
List-help: <mailto:pacnog-request@pacnog.org?subject=help>
List-id: Pacific Network Operators Group <pacnog.pacnog.org>
List-post: <mailto:pacnog@pacnog.org>
List-subscribe: <http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/pacnog>, <mailto:pacnog-request@pacnog.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/pacnog>, <mailto:pacnog-request@pacnog.org?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <447E239B.3000902@fsp.org.vu>


On 31-May-2006, at 19:15, Dan McGarry wrote:

I've heard anecdotal reports on a fault in the Southern Cross fibrelink. Can anyone confirm this or provide a useful reference link?


The following messages on NZNOG might be relevant.

http://list.waikato.ac.nz/pipermail/nznog/2006-June/011621.html
http://list.waikato.ac.nz/pipermail/nznog/2006-June/011622.html

If that's the same fault, then it looks like it has been repaired (orrouted around).

Joe

References:
- [pacnog] Southern Cross Fault?
  - From: Dan McGarry <it.psl@fsp.org.vu>

Prev by Date: [pacnog] Southern Cross Fault?
Next by Date: [pacnog] URGENT: PACNOG 2 Workshop
Previous by thread: [pacnog] Southern Cross Fault?
Next by thread: [pacnog] URGENT: PACNOG 2 Workshop
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread