APNIC Home APNIC Home


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Report of Open NIR Meeting



Folks,

Here is the summary report of Open NIR Meeting which was
held this time.

See you guys in the next "NIR SIG" !!



----------------------------------------------------------------------
Report of Open NIR Meeting
						MAEMURA Akinori, Chair
						JPNIC / France Telecom

Summary
  +	two reports about systems
  +	one discussion about NIR scheme but no significant consensus
	made, and no action items to be done
  +	Open NIR Meeting is regarded as a SIG and to be renamed to
	"NIR SIG" next time.

What is the Open NIR Meeting
  +	NIR ? National Internet Registry
  +	Serving for in-country Internet Community 
	With expertise of local language and culture

Open NIR Meeting 
  +	discusses issues on NIR operations and policies
  +	Is open to everyone, not limited to NIR people
  +	Haven’t been regarded as a SIG
  +	The 7th as NIR Meeting, the 4th as open one

Welcomes
  -	Welcome VNNIC to NIR Community!!
  	  +	EC approved , formal process to be done
  -	Co-chair was elected
	  +	Chia-Nan Hsieh, TWNIC

Reports
  -	NIR Operated IRR 
	  +	Kuniaki KONDO, Intec Netcore, Inc
	  +	Introduced a possible model operated by NIR with an 
		example of JPIRR
  -	TWNIC Resource Management System
	  +	David Chen, TWNIC
	  +	Introduced their newly developed JAVA based RMS

Discussion
  -	NIR Fee and voting structure
	  +	Izumi Okutani, JPNIC
	  -	Two alternative models to current one for fee and vote 
		were introduced for discussion
		  +	NIR regarded as LIR’s side
		  +	NIR regarded as APNIC side
		  +	However both are not very reasonable
	  -	Discussions
		  +	Current model was established after a big long 
			discussion among various constituencies, so 
			quite difficult to change
		  +	Alternative model may happen but after such 
		  	amount of discussions and negotiations
		  +	Of course must be accepted by the membership

	  -	Conclusion:
		  +	Keep on discussing on-line


NIR SIG? or Open NIR Meeting
  -	Why we haven’t regarded it as a SIG ?
	  +	Because the topic is quite limited to NIRs business 
		and operations

  -	Why not regard it as a SIG?
	  +	Quite specific to NIRs but yet a “Special Interest”
	  +	Operations and logistics are just the same
	  +	Normalization will ease Secretariat’s burden

  -	Conclusion:  Let’s call it  “NIR SIG”


							End of Report
----------------------------------------------------------------------


Regards,
Akinori