APNIC Home APNIC Home


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: New draft of NIR criteria document



Mr. Kim,

Thank you for your comment.  

You're right, each country has a different situation.  

In case of Japan, JPRS was recently re-delegated the 
management of .JP domain name, being endorsed by Japanese
Government. 

Inputs from various countries would be much appreciated. ;-)

Regards,
Akinori



In message <050f01c242ab$a77eefb0$6bd0ffcb@KISCOM>
   "Re: New draft of NIR criteria document"
   ""Byung-Kyu Kim" <bkkim@nic.or.kr>" wrote:

| 
| So far, ccTLDs have been recognized by the contry-code on ISO3166.
| Most of ccTLDs are in different situations under the Government.
| ccTLDs are still discussing on the Government envolvements.
| 
| On Paul's document, I am not quite sure about "equivalent" endorsement.
| We may need more explains on the term. If it is not related the relavent
| Government, then what will be the "equivalent" ?
| 
| 1.1      Endorsement of NIR
| 
| The selection of a particular organisation to act as NIR must be made at a
| "national" level within the country or economy concerned, namely by explicit
| Government or equivalent endorsement. This endorsement need to be expressed
| formally in order for a new NIR to be recognised by APNIC.
| 
| 
| Sincerely,
| 
| ByungKyu Kim
| 
| 
| ----- Original Message -----
| From: "MAEMURA Akinori" <maem@maem.org>
| To: <pwilson@apnic.net>; <nir-discuss@lists.apnic.net>
| Sent: Tuesday, August 13, 2002 5:24 PM
| Subject: Re: New draft of NIR criteria document
| 
| 
| > Thanks Paul for this draft.
| >
| > Folks, please present your comments on this draft onto this
| > mailing list.
| >
| >
| > The highlight of this draft would be these two points and
| > I personally think them reasonable.
| >
| >  + Executive Counsil takes the responsibility for the
| > recognition of a new NIR
| >
| >   -> AMM approval is too heavy
| >
| >
| >  + A new NIR must be endorsed by Government
| >
| >   -> similar to ccTLD delegation.
| >
| >
| >
| > looking forward to your active input to here.
| >
| >
| > Regards,
| > -----
| > MAEMURA Akinori                Director, JPNIC IP Department
| >                               maem@nic.ad.jp , maem@maem.org
| >
| >
| > In message <63B9746D4A92BF498D78584958F537E302AE12@lotus.exchange>
| >    "New draft of NIR criteria document"
| >    ""Paul Wilson" <pwilson@apnic.net>" wrote:
| >
| > | Dear NIR colleagues,
| > |
| > | Attached is a new redraft of the criteria for recognition of NIRs, for
| > | consideration during the next NIR meeting.   It is a draft only - so
| > | please feel free to post your feedback and any criticisms or comments
| > | before the meeting.
| > |
| > | Thanks and best regards,
| > |
| > | Paul Wilson
| > | APNIC
| > |
| >
| >
| > -----
| > MAEMURA Akinori                Director, JPNIC IP Department
| >                               maem@nic.ad.jp , maem@maem.org
| >
| >
| >
| 
|