[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: NIR Operational Policies DRAFT
Thank Anne,
Regarding last suggestion, I made a big mistake.
Before the day when I wrote the sugestion, I waked up whole day due to my project
for next year with our government, so I missed it.
Sorry Again.
Yong Wan Ju
=============================================================
IP Address Management Team in Korea Network Information Center
Manager Yong Wan Ju / Tel : +82-2-2186-4536 Mail : ywju@nic.or.kr
=============================================================
-----Original Message-----
From: Anne Lord [mailto:anne@apnic.net]
Sent: Monday, August 12, 2002 9:17 AM
To: ???
Cc: nir-discuss@apnic.net; ip-all@nic.or.kr
Subject: RE: NIR Operational Policies DRAFT
Hi Yong Wan,
>
> Personally, I would like to send my warmest thanks for circulation of APNIC document
> which summarize of NIR Operational Policy.
>
> Though minor items, after going though this documents, I would like to indicate some
> points necessary to modify.
> First, in Section 2.7, you had better insert remark about "experimental addresses"
> after "excluding multicast adddresses" for more accurate expression.
yes good point.
> Second, as you are already aware, in the case of NIR's request, APNIC staffs will be
> difficult to keep response time of "Service Levels" in Section 3.5. Accordingly, In my
> opinion, APNIC had better change this into applicable time.
Thanks for your note here.
Just to clarify we are talking about two different response times.
The 48 hours is what we have operating today - 2 days turnaround time.
The 1.0 day turnaround time is intended for the requests
for an allocation which have been evaluated by the NIR and just need the
actual allocation to be performed by the Secretariat. (ie. no evaluation
by APNIC)
Maybe the heading needs to be 'response times' to make this clearer?
> And lastly, according to this document, APNIC remarks just "Transfer of membership
> from NIR to APNIC" in Section 4.2. Therefore, if it possible, please specify the reverse
> case which will be happen.
Did you see section 4.1?
> That's all I would like to suggest.
thanks very much for your comments.
Best wishes and see you soon,
Anne
--
>
> Thank you again for all of these.
> And see you in Japan meeting.
>
> Best regards,
>
> Yong Wan Ju
>
> =============================================================
> IP Address Management Team in Korea Network Information Center
> Manager Yong Wan Ju / Tel : +82-2-2186-4536 Mail : ywju@nic.or.kr
> =============================================================
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-nir-discuss@lists.apnic.net [mailto:owner-nir-discuss@lists.apnic.net]On Behalf Of Anne Lord
> Sent: Wednesday, August 07, 2002 3:34 PM
> To: nir-discuss@apnic.net
> Subject: NIR Operational Policies DRAFT
>
>
>
> Dear NIR members of APNIC,
>
> Attached is the first draft of the document :
>
> "Operational Policies for National Internet Registries operating in the
> APNIC region"
>
> This will be presented at the forthcoming Open NIR meeting in Japan. The
> document describes the procedural interactions between APNIC and the NIR.
> It does not discuss address policies.
>
> Feedback from the NIRs on this document is particularly welcomed.
>
> I would like to ask that feedback is sent to this list no later than Monday
> 26th August, so as to allow sufficient time to incorporate changes into the
> document prior to the meeting.
>
> Many thanks and Kind regards,
>
> Anne
> _____________________________________________________________________
> Anne Lord, Manager, Policy Liaison <anne@apnic.net>
> Asia Pacific Network Information Centre ph/fx: +61 7 3858 3100/99
> See you at the 14th APNIC Open Policy Meeting Kitakyushu, Japan
> http://www.apnic.net/meetings/ 3-6 September 2002
> _____________________________________________________________________
>
>
>
>
>
>
>