[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: IPv6 fee for NIR members
Dear NIRs,
Thank you very much for your comments on this issue. APNIC EC will
discuss this in the next meeting scheduled for Jul 19.
Best regards,
Che-Hoo Cheng
Chairman
APNIC EC
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-nir-discuss@lists.apnic.net
[mailto:owner-nir-discuss@lists.apnic.net]
> On Behalf Of Á¨Ψk
> Sent: Wednesday, July 03, 2002 12:10 PM
> To: hostmaster; Izumi Okutani; nir-discuss@apnic.net
> Subject: RE: IPv6 fee for NIR members
>
> Hi Izumi and Yong Wong,
>
> Thank JPNIC for the proposal.
>
> TWNIC also feels US$1,966 per allocation is a bit too high.
> We support JPNIC's proposal and hope APNIC can reconsider about the
costs to
> NIRs.
> As IPv6 minimum allocation adjusted from /35 to /32, the fee structure
should be
> modified
> accordingly.
>
>
> Thank you.
>
> Chianan@TWNIC
>
>
> > Hi, Izumi
> >
> > I agree with JPNIC's opinion based on our situation similar with
JPNIC.
> > Please, could APNIC consider our NIR's restrictions on budget plan ?
> >
> > Yong Wan Ju
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: owner-nir-discuss@lists.apnic.net
> [mailto:owner-nir-discuss@lists.apnic.net]On
> Behalf Of Izumi Okutani
> > Sent: Wednesday, July 03, 2002 11:53 AM
> > To: nir-discuss@apnic.net
> > Subject: IPv6 fee for NIR members
> >
> >
> > Hi all,
> >
> >
> > As you know, NIRs are paying per address fee for IPv6 allocations on
> > /48 basis. We are currently paying US$246(US$0.03*8192) to APNIC per
> > /35 allocation.
> >
> > When the allocation size increases to /32 in the new policy, we must
> > pay US$1,966(0.03*65536) per allocation.
> >
> > Note: To make it simple, we are assuming that there is no change in
> > membership category
> >
> > Unlike IPv4, we are charging our members per IPv6 allocation
request,
> > and since this could lead to a substantial fee increase for our
> > members, we are hoping to maintain the same fee if possible.
> >
> > Could APNIC consider maintaining the same fee even after /32, just
> > like the way you have reviewed the membership fee for other APNIC
> > members?
> >
> > This can be probably be realised if you calculate per address fee on
> > /45 basis and not /48. Please let us know what you think.
> >
> >
> > Regards,
> > Izumi
> > JPNIC
> >
> >
>
> Chia-Nan Hsieh
> IP Analyst and Policy Coordinator
> Internet Resource Services Department, TWNIC
BEGIN:VCARD
VERSION:2.1
N:Cheng;Che-Hoo
FN:Mr. Che-Hoo Cheng
ORG:Hong Kong Internet Registration Corporation
TITLE:CEO
TEL;WORK;VOICE:+852-2319-1313
TEL;WORK;FAX:+852-2319-2626
ADR;WORK:;;306A, Tech Centre, 72 Tat Chee Avenue, Kowloon Tong;Hong Kong
LABEL;WORK;ENCODING=QUOTED-PRINTABLE:306A, Tech Centre, 72 Tat Chee Avenue, Kowloon Tong=0D=0AHong Kong
URL;WORK:http://www.hkirc.net.hk
EMAIL;PREF;INTERNET:ceo@hkirc.net.hk
REV:20020620T064425Z
END:VCARD