Re: Emergency Allocation

["Hostmaster" <hostmast@nic.or.kr>]

Hi All,

> > Some concerns we raised that the way JPNIC deals with urgent
> > allocation requests is not consistent with that of APNIC.
> > 
> > We would like to implement the same practice as APNIC and therefore
> > have a few questions about APNIC's "emergency allocation" scheme.
> > 
> > Do you apply it when a hostmaster sees as appropriate, or is there a
> > certain requirement to receive this type of allocation?

As far as I know, there is no articles relating to the requirements 
to be eligible for "emergency allocation" in KRNIC's official documents.
If such case happens, we may also apply normal DB registration and A/W mechanism 
to request evaluation considering the time pressure.

> > How do you judge the allocation size?
> > 
> > In JPNIC's case, we have made a minimum allocation to urgents cases
> > and continued evaluation in order to allocate an appropriate size
> > additionally.
> 
> In most cases we practice the same way as JPNIC does, few exceptions.
>
> > This is based on hostmaster's judgement and it is not publilized as an
> > official scheme.
> 
> It is not publicized in TWNIC documentation, too.

Almost same practice here, and it is not publicized either.
 
> > We also accept additional allocation requests under 80% utilization
> > rate if they are able to justify the reason.

As I presented in Taipei mt., KRNIC apply 90% to the total allocation except the last allocation 
and 70% to the last allocation in the normal request evaluation.

I think the above utilization would be also applied to "emergency allocation".

Best wishes,

MH Cheon