Re: [hostmaster-staff] Renaming - NIR meeting to NIR SIG

[John Tran <john@apnic.net>]

Hi Maemura-san,

Thank you for your clarification. I was confused between a WG and a SIG
but it is very clear now. I think it is a good idea to have all meetings
with the same name, so a SIG for NIR is okay.

son

On Tue, 11 Dec 2001, MAEMURA Akinori wrote:

> Son,
> 
> Thanks you your comment.  It was originally Anne's proposal 
> and I found NIR Meeting is held just like other SIGs - 
> Policy SIG, Routing SIG, IPv6 SIG, in terms of its openness,
> calling for presentation and focusing a certain portion of
> interest.  Now I think we don't need a special naming for
> NIR's one.  Does it make sense?
> 
> 
> Regards,
> Akinori
> 
> 
> 
> In message <Pine.UW2.4.10.10112111410310.9733-100000@hadrian>
>    "Re: [hostmaster-staff] Renaming - NIR meeting to NIR SIG"
>    "John Tran <john@apnic.net>" wrote:
> 
> | 
> | Hi Maemura-san,
> | 
> | Thank you for being a proactive chairman but I am not clear on the reason
> | why do you wish to convert the NIR meeting to become a SIG. Based on my
> | knowledge, please correct me if I am wrong, the SIG is a group of people
> | come together as a working group to find a solution to a problem or issue
> | then when the solution is found the group will desolve. An example of such
> | group is the cable modem SIG, which is now does not exist because this
> | group had produced a policy for cable Modem. Where as NIR meeting, it was
> | original set up to allow NIRs and APNIC come together and discuss issues
> | in the AP that could affect both APNIC and NIRs as a whole. As such I
> | believe that the NIR meeting should be an ongoing process or do you wish
> | to make this meeting less frequent?
> | 
> | son
> | 
> | 
> | On Tue, 11 Dec 2001, MAEMURA Akinori wrote:
> | 
> | > Folks,
> | > 
> | > I was proposed renaming NIR meeting to NIR SIG.
> | > The point is that NIR Meeting is now fully open to any 
> | > parties and no significant difference from other SIGs.
> | > 
> | > I, as the chair, have no objection and think that is much 
> | > convenient for meeting operations so I'd like to accept this
> | > proposal if you agree.
> | > 
> | > 
> | > Please present your opinion regardless positive/supporting
> | > or negative/objection, to this list.  Thanks in advance.
> | > 
> | > 
> | > Regards,
> | > -----
> | > MAEMURA Akinori               JPNIC IP Address Working Group
> | > 
> | > *    Mailing List: hostmaster-staff                                    *
> | > *    Handled by majordomo@staff.apnic.net                              *
> | > 
> | 
> | 
>