Re: BOUNCE nir-discuss@lists.apnic.net: Non-member submission from [MAEMURA Akinori <maem@maem.org>]

[Anne Lord <anne@apnic.net>]

Maemura San,

Please accept my apologies for my late reply on this and thank you for your 
suggestion. We are in the process of setting this up and making changes to 
the web page.

As soon as it is done, we will send a posting to nir-discuss@lists.apnic.net.

Best wishes,

Anne
Manager, Member Services
APNIC

> >From owner-nir-discuss  Wed Mar 14 19:20:53 2001
>Received: from kiwi.gip.ad.jp ([202.216.40.14])
>         by ns.apnic.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id TAA127075
>         for <nir-discuss@apnic.net>; Wed, 14 Mar 2001 19:20:52 +1000 (EST)
>Received: from maem (maem.tok.globalone.net [160.81.176.5])
>         by kiwi.gip.ad.jp (8.9.3/3.7W-maem20010105) with ESMTP id SAA87616;
>         Wed, 14 Mar 2001 18:20:55 +0900 (JST)
>To: nir-discuss@apnic.net
>Subject: to have nir-discuss open
>From: MAEMURA Akinori <maem@maem.org>
>Message-Id: <200103141821.AHH46742.NFNB@maem.org>
>X-Mailer: Winbiff [Version 2.32beta2]
>X-Accept-Language: ja,en
>Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2001 18:21:08 +0900
>Mime-Version: 1.0
>Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
>
>NIR Folks,
>
>   In the last NIR meeting in KL,  we concluded that we would
>have the NIR mailing list open to the public.
>
>   I believe and I insisted it should be open to discuss
>about NIR itself, but for discussion of detailed procedural
>issues, It may be still convenient to have a list which is
>limited within NIR staffs.
>
> >From such a point of view,  my proposal here is like below.
>
>         nir-discuss:    open to the public to discuss about
>                         handline NIRs
>
>         nir-members:    limited to NIR staffs for
>                         correspondance and discussion about
>                         procedural details and so on
>
>
>   Your opinion input would be highly appreciated.
>
>
>Best Regards,
>-----
>MAEMURA Akinori               JPNIC IP Address Working Group