Re: [GLOBAL-V6] Increased traffic on AMS-IX

To: Michal Ludvig <mludvig@logix.net.nz>
Subject: Re: [GLOBAL-V6] Increased traffic on AMS-IX
From: AKK <andrius@andrius.org>
Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2008 18:51:39 +0100
Cc: global-v6@lists.apnic.net
Delivered-to: global-v6@clove.apnic.net
In-reply-to: <48029576.7040501@logix.net.nz>
List-archive: <http://mailman.apnic.net/mailing-lists/global-v6>
List-help: <mailto:global-v6-request@lists.apnic.net?subject=help>
List-id: Discussion of new global IPv6 policy development <global-v6.lists.apnic.net>
List-post: <mailto:global-v6@lists.apnic.net>
List-subscribe: <http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/global-v6>, <mailto:global-v6-request@lists.apnic.net?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/global-v6>, <mailto:global-v6-request@lists.apnic.net?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <48029576.7040501@logix.net.nz>
User-agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.12 (Windows/20080213)

not likely, but maybe wikipedia ?

http://www.personal.psu.edu/dvm105/blogs/ipv6/2008/04/wikipedias-foray-into-ipv6.html


Michal Ludvig wrote:

is here anyone on the list who could shed some light on the hugelyincreased IPv6 traffic through AMS-IX since a week ago? Have a look atthe weekly and monthly graphs here:http://www.ams-ix.net/technical/stats/sflow_stats_ipv6.htmlApparently on April 8 in the afternoon happened "something" that madethe v6 traffic about doubled immediately. Has some major website turnedIPv6 on or what? I'm just curious.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [GLOBAL-V6] Increased traffic on AMS-IX
  - From: Jeroen Massar <jeroen@unfix.org>

References:
- [GLOBAL-V6] Increased traffic on AMS-IX
  - From: Michal Ludvig <mludvig@logix.net.nz>

Prev by Date: Re: [GLOBAL-V6] Increased traffic on AMS-IX
Next by Date: Re: [GLOBAL-V6] Increased traffic on AMS-IX
Previous by thread: Re: [GLOBAL-V6] Increased traffic on AMS-IX
Next by thread: Re: [GLOBAL-V6] Increased traffic on AMS-IX
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread