![]() |
![]() |
|
You're here: Home |
On Jul 19, 2005, at 10:28 AM, Thomas Narten wrote:
And to be clear, I don't believe anyone is proposing this. I.e., going from a /56 to a /48 would require renumbering, most likely.
I think it'd be appropriate to do the binary split sparse allocation approach, but that's an implementation decision. Given IPv6 technology right now, I think it would be prudent to reduce the cost of renumbering if possible.
Rgds, -drc