|
|
| 35:10) 06-MAR-2003 17:11 Jim Rutt |
| oh, BTW, Gordon, can you edit the title of this topic.... "debacle"
brings in an assumed answer. 'taint as black and white as all that. not
at all.
|
| 35:11) 06-MAR-2003 17:13 Kathy |
| Jim, I hope you'll carry that "not black or white" message forward in a number of discussions here. |
| 35:12) 06-MAR-2003 17:23 Gordon Cook |
| well Jim I am absolutely prepared to listen to you ideas as to why
it wasn't isn't a debacle but i am going to have to be convinced by fresh
information.
show me ...show us why it taint so black and white? ICANN fur damn sure a debacle.... you role there in? based on what is known it is hard fo me to come to a definite conclusion..... based on how fast the rutt reports disappeared, it looks to me like some one or something managed to get you to execute quite a U-tun |
| 35:13) 07-MAR-2003 13:03 Jim Rutt |
| I'll have to go see if I still have a copy of Rutt Report #1. As I recall it, it actually wasn't anti-ICANN, rather it was anti an over-reaching ICANN. I will admit, however, that it was very carefully crafted (with out a doubt the most re-written and heavily editted doc I ever wrote, despite it's rather "folksy" style) to be "Clintonian", so folks could read in it what they wanted!!!! |